Robert J. White v. Operator Croswell, Jr.

967 F.2d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert J. WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Operator CROSWELL, Jr., et al., Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-15659. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 1992. * Decided May 29, 1992. Before HUG, SKOPIL and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant, Robert White, appeals the district court's dismissal of his section 1983 suit. White alleges that the appellees violated his right to due process by breaking the chain of custody of his urine sample, by disciplining him on the basis of the results of one EMIT test, and by refusing to permit him to have an independent drug test performed. White also argues that the district court erred by dismissing the complaint without conducting a fact-finding hearing or discovery, and by finding that White's allegations about the participation of Hatcher and Apo were insufficient. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm.…