United States v. Jack Lande

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 9127·968 F.2d 907·1992 WL 145088·20 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1753·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14725
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 199291-30185, 91-30186California3,966 words

Opinion

Opinion

Browning, J.

Jack Lande modified General Instruments Videocipher II descrambler units to enable home satellite dish owners to view scrambled pay television programming without payment. He pled guilty to numerous charges and was sentenced to 35 months in prison.

Before pleading guilty, Lande moved to dismiss charges against him based on the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) (also known as Title I or the Wiretap Law), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521 , arguing the ECPA does not apply to piracy of satellite television. The district court denied his motion. Lande’s guilty plea reserved his right to appeal the denial. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2).

The Circuits are divided as to whether the ECPA prohibits modification of descramblers to allow unauthorized viewing of scrambled satellite television. Compare United States v. McNutt, 908 F.2d 561 (10th Cir.1990) (holding section 2512 of the ECPA prohibits modification of descramblers) with United States v. Herring, 933 F.2d 932 (11th Cir.1991) and United States v. Hux, 940 F.2d 314 (8th Cir.1991) (2-1) (reaching the opposite conclusion). We agree with the Tenth Circuit that the ECPA does apply, and affirm the district court.

I

Sellers of pay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.