United States v. Michael David Sitton, United States of America v. Ronald Lee Dewbre, United States of America v. Anthony Croushorn, Jr., United States of America v. Criciente Romero, United States of America v. Frank Ernest Piantadosi

968 F.2d 947 36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 282 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael David SITTON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Lee DEWBRE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony CROUSHORN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Criciente ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Ernest PIANTADOSI, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50154, 91-50156, 91-50166 * , 91-50173 * and 91-50199 * . United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued May 5, 1992. Submitted June 15, 1992. Decided July 2, 1992. Joseph T. Vodnoy and Joseph F. Walsh, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant Dewbre. Carolyn Chapman, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant Sitton. Terry Amdur, Pasadena, Cal., for defendant-appellant Croushorn. Rose Reilly, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant Romero. John P. Martin, Talcott, Lightfoot, Vandevelde, Woehrle & Sadowsky, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant Piantadosi. Melinda L. Haag, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.…