Collins v. Nordstrom

968 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Squakee-Martha COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORDSTROM, a Washington Corp.; Scott Wetzel Services, a private insurance corporation; Dr. Michael Bidgood, a medical physician; Ralph Pond, an attorney, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35916. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 8, 1992. * Decided July 13, 1992. Before POOLE, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Squakee-Martha Collins appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in her civil rights action in favor of defendants Nordstrom, Inc.; Ralph Pond, Nordstrom's attorney; Scott Wetzel Services, Inc. ("Wetzel"); and Dr. Michael Bidgood, a medical physician. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 1 We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990), and affirm. 3 * Background 4 In October 1982, Collins, then…