Camilo Aispuro-Llanes v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

968 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Camilo AISPURO-LLANES, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70448. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 22, 1992. * Decided July 15, 1992. Before CHOY, SNEED and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Camilo Aispuro-Llanes seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) decision affirming the immigration judge's denial of his application for discretionary relief from deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c). We affirm. 3 Aispuro-Llanes's only objection is to the immigration judge's requirement that he demonstrate "outstanding equities" for 212(c) relief, because Aispuro-Llanes had been previously convicted of a drug-related crime. On September 19, 1991, two months after Aispuro-Llanes filed his petition for review in this court, we handed down Ayala-Chavez v. INS, 944 F.2d 638…