Miguel Carrillo-Avila v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

968 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Miguel CARRILLO-AVILA, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70223. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 8, 1992. Decided July 1, 1992. Before CANBY, REINHARDT WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Miguel Carrillo-Avila appeals from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge's 1988 deportation order and denying his motion to reopen a 1984 deportation order. We affirm the BIA's conclusion that no error occurred during the 1988 proceedings. We conclude that prejudicial error occurred during the 1984 deportation proceedings and, accordingly, order the BIA to grant the motion to reopen and remand for further proceedings. 1988 Hearing 3 Carrillo-Avila contends that the immigration judge made three procedural errors in the 1988 deportation proceedings. 1. Denial of a Third…