Grenz v. EBI/Orion Group, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
968 F.2d 1220 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel J. GRENZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EBI/ORION GROUP, INC.; Fire and Casualty Insurance Company of Connecticut; Don Macmillan; Edward Eberly; E. Craig Daue; the Law Firm of Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35674. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 7, 1992. * Decided July 9, 1992. Before ALARCON, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel J. Grenz appeals pro se the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , due process, and declaratory relief claims. Grenz's insurance carrier paid him workers' compensation benefits for injuries Grenz suffered in 1984. In February 1988, the insurer required Grenz to submit to an examination by a panel of physicians pursuant to Mont.Code Ann. § 39-71-605 to determine whether he was still eligible for workers' compensation benefits. In August 1988, on the basis of data received from the panel, the…