Leo F. Morrical v. Katu/tv of Portland, Oregonian Larry Leeman, of Gresham Police Department, and Oregonian Publishing Company
Opinion
Opinion
968 F.2d 1221 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leo F. MORRICAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KATU/TV OF PORTLAND, Oregonian; Larry Leeman, of Gresham Police Department, Defendant, and OREGONIAN PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appellee. No. 91-36043. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 8, 1992. * Decided July 15, 1992. Before POOLE, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leo Morrical appeals pro se the district court's dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d) of his civil rights action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's section 1915(d) dismissal for abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992), and affirm. 3 Morrical filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The magistrate judge granted Morrical leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a). Nevertheless, the magistrate judge found Morrical's…