James H. Hudson v. E.R. Meyers, Warden

968 F.2d 1221 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James H. HUDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.R. MEYERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-15889. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 12, 1992. * Decided July 14, 1992. Before ALARCON, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Petitioner James H. Hudson appeals pro se the denial of his petition for habeas corpus. In his petition, Hudson challenged the state court's calculation of his sentence for two counts of rape in violation of California Penal Code § 261(2), one count of oral copulation in violation of California Penal Code § 288a(c), one count of attempted murder in violation of California Penal Code §§ 187 and 664, and one count of kidnapping in violation of California Penal Code § 207. We affirm. 3 * The state court sentenced Hudson to 25 years imprisonment. Hudson received two separate eight year terms for the two rape counts, a two year term…