Jim Prartnadi v. Marriott Corporation Host International

968 F.2d 1221 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jim PRARTNADI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARRIOTT CORPORATION; Host International, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55425. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 8, 1992. * Decided July 13, 1992. Before POOLE, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jim Prartnadi appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants Marriott Corporation and Host International ("Host") in his employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VII"). Prartnadi contends that genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether Host discriminated against him based on his national origin (Thai). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Yartzoff v. Thomas, 809 F.2d 1371, 1373 (9th Cir.1987). Viewing the evidence in the light most…