United States v. James Sanford Flack, United States of America v. Steven Batts, United States of America v. Gary Jerome Foster, United States of America v. Michael Norman Zivich, United States of America v. Donald Eugene Bates

Good Law
968 F.2d 1221
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 199291-30246California2,471 words

Opinion

Opinion

968 F.2d 1221 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Sanford FLACK, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven BATTS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Jerome FOSTER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Norman ZIVICH, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Eugene BATES, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30246, 91-30247, 91-30281, 91-30313 and 91-30426. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1992. Decided July 21, 1992. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Nov. 19, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and CROCKER, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Flack, Batts, Foster, Zivich, and Bates appeal from their convictions for manufacture of and conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.