Bruce A. Seymour v. Heritage Partners Chung Li Cheng Su Chu Chou Cheng

968 F.2d 1221 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bruce A. SEYMOUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HERITAGE PARTNERS; Chung LI Cheng; Su Chu Chou Cheng, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15667. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 24, 1992. * Decided July 1, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bruce A. Seymour appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for rehearing of the bankruptcy court's order dismissing his adversary proceeding for declaratory and injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d) and affirm. 3 On February 5, 1991, the district court dismissed Seymour's action for injunctive and declaratory relief. On March 5, 1991 Seymour filed a motion for rehearing in which he requested relief from the order of dismissal. On April 24, 1991, the district court denied Seymour's motion on the grounds that it was untimely pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8015 and…