Kraszewski v. State Farm General Ins. Co.

Good Law
968 F.2d 1221·1992 WL 149864·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23070
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 199291-15765California1,250 words

Opinion

Opinion

968 F.2d 1221 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Muriel E. KRASZEWSKI, et al., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, and Marie L. Nichols-Perry, Intervenor-Appellant, v. STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15765. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 10, 1992. Decided July 1, 1992. Before ALARCON, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Marie Nichols-Perry appeals the denial of her motion for permission to intervene in the remedy phase of a class action against State Farm Insurance Company. Both the Chief Special Master and the district court denied her motion. Because we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See In re Benny, 791 F.2d 712 , 720 (9th Cir.1986). 3 * The jurisdictional analysis depends on the type…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.