United States v. Louis J. Ogle

968 F.2d 1222 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis J. OGLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30407. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 8, 1992. Decided July 10, 1992. Before POOLE, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis J. Ogle appeals his convictions following a jury trial for four counts of tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 . Ogle contends that the district court erred by failing to give the jury a specific unanimity instruction, and that his convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 * Specific Unanimity Instruction 4 Because Ogle failed to request a specific unanimity instruction or object to the district court's instruction, we review for plain error. United States v. Castro, 887 F.2d 988, 992 (9th Cir.1989). "Plain error is highly prejudicial error affecting…