Unpingco v. Baba Corp.

968 F.2d 1222 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Segundo A. UNPINGCO; Pacific Equity and Capital Enterprises Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BABA CORPORATION; Northern Development Corporation; Macau-Hong Kong Corporation; Paul Bordallo, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16101. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1992. Decided July 15, 1992. Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, BRUNETTI and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Plaintiffs-Appellants Pacific Equity, Capital Enterprise, Inc., and Segundo Unpingco appeal from the dismissal of a complaint seeking to terminate a lease under the provisions of the Guam unlawful detainer statute for the non-payment of taxes by Defendants-Appellees Baba Corporation, Northern Development Corporation, Macau-Hong Kong Corporation, and Paul Bordallo. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 3 In 1962, Jose and Vicenta Unpingco, Plaintiffs-Appellants' ancestors, executed a lease of real property to…