United States v. Michael D. Grant

968 F.2d 1222 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael D. GRANT, Defendant-Appellant No. 90-50234. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 7, 1992. * Decided July 15, 1992. 1 Before JAMES R. BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MACBRIDE, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Michael D. Grant, appearing pro se, appeals his conviction and sentence for credit card fraud. Grant claims a number of trial errors including ineffective assistance of counsel, a violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 5(a) in that no probable cause hearing was provided and error arising out of an alleged delay between initial arrest and indictment and trial in federal court. In addition, Grant claims the court erred at sentencing by using Grant's prior convictions for sentence enhancement, by ordering restitution and by failing to attach to the Presentence Investigation Report a written record of the…