United States v. Jose Manuel Vigoa

Good Law
968 F.2d 1222·1992 WL 167985
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 199291-10126California3,905 words

Opinion

Opinion

968 F.2d 1222 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Manuel VIGOA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10126. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 1992. Decided July 20, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Jose Manuel Vigoa appeals his jury convictions for distribution of cocaine, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and conspiracy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. He also appeals his jury convictions for unlawful use of a firearm and assault upon a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924 (c) and 111. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. DISCUSSION I. Sufficiency of the Evidence 3 Vigoa contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for conspiracy, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and unlawful use of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.