Vladimir Zatko, Dr. v. James K. Rowland Bernie Aispuro, Warden

968 F.2d 1223 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vladimir ZATKO, Dr. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James K. ROWLAND; Bernie Aispuro, Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15385. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1992. * Decided June 29, 1992. MEMORANDUM ** Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 Vladimir Zatko, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motions for preliminary injunctions in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 2 We reverse a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction only where the court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact. Religious Technology Center, Church of Scientology Int'l, Inc. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306, 1309 (9th Cir.1989). 3 Here, the district court properly applied the two alternative tests set out by…