Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 9413·970 F.2d 564·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 15214·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5980
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 199291-55059California5,297 words

Opinion

Opinion

970 F.2d 564 MILNE TRUCK LINES, INC. and Consolidated/Mark, a Joint Venture Between Consolidated International Stores Corp. and Mark Services, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MAKITA U.S.A., INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-55059. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 3, 1991. Decided July 7, 1992. Mary Kay Reynolds, Kroll & Tract, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Miles L. Kavaller, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before BROWNING, BOOCHEVER, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: 1 The primary question presented by this case is whether in a suit brought by a motor common carrier under the Interstate Commerce Act for recovery of its filed rate the defendant shipper may plead unreasonableness of the filed rate as a defense. We conclude that the filed rate doctrine, as set forth in Maislin Industries, U.S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc., 497 U.S. 116 , 110 S.Ct. 2759 , 111 L.Ed.2d 94 (1990), does not bar such a defense, but that because the reasonableness of a motor common carrier filed rate falls within the primary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.