36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 187, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,258 John Doe v. Cutter Biological, Inc., a Division of Miles Laboratories, Inc., Miles Laboratories, Inc., Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Armour Pharmaceutical Corporation, Alpha Therapeutic Corporation and United States of America, John Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc., a Division of Miles Laboratories, Inc., Miles Laboratories, Inc., Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Armour Pharmaceutical Corporation, Alpha Therapeutic Corporation and United States of America

Good Law
971 F.2d 375
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 29, 199289-15274California6,549 words

Opinion

Opinion

971 F.2d 375 36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 187 , Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 13,258 John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUTTER BIOLOGICAL, INC., A DIVISION OF MILES LABORATORIES, INC., Miles Laboratories, Inc., Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Armour Pharmaceutical Corporation, Alpha Therapeutic Corporation and United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. John SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUTTER BIOLOGICAL, INC., A DIVISION OF MILES LABORATORIES, INC., Miles Laboratories, Inc., Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Armour Pharmaceutical Corporation, Alpha Therapeutic Corporation and United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 89-15274, 89-15839. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1990. Withdrawn from Submission Nov. 28, 1990. Resubmitted July 14, 1992. Decided July 29, 1992. Charles R. Kozak and John Rapp, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellants John Doe and John Smith. David I. Bell, Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, Universal City, Cal., for defendant-appellee Alpha Therapeutic Corp. Duncan Barr, Deborah H. Leibman, O'Connor, Cohn, Dillon & Barr, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee Cutter Biological, a div. of Miles Inc. Douglas F. Fuson,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.