United States v. Julio Gomez-Padilla

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 10893·972 F.2d 284·1992 WL 183795·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17679·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6817
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 199291-50683California775 words

Opinion

Opinion

Julio Gomez-Padilla (Gomez) appeals from his sentence, imposed following a jury trial, for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. Gomez was resentenced upon remand from this court, and he contends that the district court erred by failing to exercise its discretion to consider his exemplary behavior in prison as a basis for reducing his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

The district court originally sentenced Gomez to 136 months incarceration. We affirmed Gomez’s conviction but vacated his sentence and remanded for resentenc-ing because the district court had improperly relied on inaccurate information that Gomez had received $3,000 for his role in the offense. The district court resentenced Gomez to 136 months incarceration for reasons other than the alleged payment. It refused to consider Gomez’s good behavior in prison during the intervening two years on grounds that the applicable version of Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 (1987) barred such consideration.

Gomez argues that the district court erred by failing to exercise its discretion to take into…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.