Hyland v. Wonder
Opinion
Opinion
972 F.2d 1129 Lanric HYLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy L. WONDER, Supervising Judge, Juvenile Court, individually and in his official capacity, et alia; Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco; Dennis Sweeney; Fred Jordan; San Francisco Juvenile Probation Commission; Diane LaPlante; City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees, and Stephen La Plante, Defendant. No. 90-16796. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 16, 1992. Decided Aug. 21, 1992. Raymond D. Battocchi, McLean, Va., for plaintiff-appellant. Sharon S. Chandler, Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Vicki A. Clayton, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before TANG, PREGERSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. TANG, Circuit Judge: 1 Lanric Hyland worked for a lengthy period of time as a volunteer for the San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department. In February 1989, Hyland prepared a memorandum to the judges supervising the San Francisco Juvenile Hall that detailed numerous problems at the Hall and…