Hyland v. Wonder

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 11613·972 F.2d 1129·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19333·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7174
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 199290-16796California8,271 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1129 Lanric HYLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy L. WONDER, Supervising Judge, Juvenile Court, individually and in his official capacity, et alia; Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco; Dennis Sweeney; Fred Jordan; San Francisco Juvenile Probation Commission; Diane LaPlante; City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees, and Stephen La Plante, Defendant. No. 90-16796. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 16, 1992. Decided Aug. 21, 1992. Raymond D. Battocchi, McLean, Va., for plaintiff-appellant. Sharon S. Chandler, Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Vicki A. Clayton, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before TANG, PREGERSON and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. TANG, Circuit Judge: 1 Lanric Hyland worked for a lengthy period of time as a volunteer for the San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department. In February 1989, Hyland prepared a memorandum to the judges supervising the San Francisco Juvenile Hall that detailed numerous problems at the Hall and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.