Benjamin Adams v. Los Angeles Superior Court System

972 F.2d 1336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Benjamin ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT SYSTEM, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 91-55833, 91-55886. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 10, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In this consolidated appeal, Benjamin Adams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action. Adams contends that the district court erred in dismissing his amended complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). 1 We vacate and remand. 3 In his original complaint, Adams alleged that three judges and a prosecutor conspired to secure his conviction. A magistrate judge filed a proposed report and recommendation in which he (1) recommended that the district court grant the defendants' motion to dismiss Adams's original complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) on the…