Baugh v. Continental Cas. Co.

Good Law
972 F.2d 1336·1992 WL 164294·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 27414
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 199290-16457California2,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert H. BAUGH; William P. Dorsey; Nick Westlund; Jean M. Patterson, Baugh Construction Company, a Washington Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, an insurance corporation, Transcontinental Insurance Company, an insurance corporation; CNA Insurance Co., an affiliation of insurance companies, Defendants- Appellees. No. 90-16457. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 1992. Decided July 15, 1992. Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. ORDER The petition for rehearing is granted. The Memorandum Disposition filed February 27, 1992 is hereby withdrawn. Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Baugh Construction Company and several individuals affiliated with it appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of CNA Insurance Companies ("CNA") and two of its subsidiaries. The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.