Antonio Raul Ayala-Chavez v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

972 F.2d 1336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio Raul AYALA-CHAVEZ, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70262. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 20, 1992. * Decided Aug. 26, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, BEEZER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Antonio Ayala-Chavez ("Ayala") petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") decision upholding an immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of Ayala's application for discretionary relief from deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c). The gist of Ayala's argument on appeal is that the BIA improperly considered, inter alia, an incorrect version of his state driving record as evidence of Ayala's insufficient rehabilitation from the drug offenses that formed the basis of the IJ's uncontested finding of deportability under 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(11). We reject Ayala's contentions and affirm the BIA. 3 In Ayala-Chavez v.…