Khairy Aref, Dr. v. Deane Dana Peter F. Schabarum Kenneth F. Hahn Edmund D. Edelman N. Keith Abbott

972 F.2d 1336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Khairy AREF, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deane DANA; Peter F. Schabarum; Kenneth F. Hahn; Edmund D. Edelman; N. Keith Abbott, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55982. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 7, 1992. * Decided Aug. 11, 1992. Before FLETCHER, O'SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of appellant Khairy Aref and the defendants, various employees of the County of Los Angeles, the district court entered a judgment on June 28, 1990. The judgment provided Aref with back pay, certain medical and legal expenses, and a limited ninety day reinstatement for the purpose of helping Aref secure new employment. Aref subsequently moved the district court to set aside the judgment on the grounds that the defendants failed to comply with its terms. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3). 3 The district court appointed a special master to consider Aref's…