Andrade v. Parsons Corp.

Good Law
972 F.2d 1336·1992 WL 182218·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 27419
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 199290-56202California1,693 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Fausto G. ANDRADE; Daniel G. Apaez; Kenneth D. Carpenter; Fred W. Castelin; Jimmie D. Cox; Robin L. (Farber) Ramage; Lilia M. Gonzalez; Santiago G. Guerrero; Gregory L. McEwan; Mary L. Rouse; Antonio Sainz; Henry P. Silka; John Ziats, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PARSONS CORPORATION, The Ralph M. Parsons Company, Parsons Constructors, Inc., The Parsons Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan; Robert M. Daiss; Fred H. Felberg; F. David Frost; Gordon L. Hough; William E. Leonhard; Otha C. Roddey; Lawrence R. Tollenaere; Robert M. Davidson; Thomas L. Langford; Larry N. Fincannon; John Mewha; James R. Sessions, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-56202. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 1991. Decided July 31, 1992. 1 Before SCHROEDER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and REED, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 In 1984, Senior Executives with the Parsons Corporation decided it would be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.