ARB, Inc. v. Luz Const., Inc.

Good Law
972 F.2d 1336·1992 WL 164487·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 27415
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 199291-55758California2,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. ARB, INC., a California Corporation; ARB Fabricated Systems, Inc.; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LUZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.; Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company of California, a California corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55758. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1992. * Decided July 16, 1992. 1 Before SNEED and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and ROLL, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Arb, Inc. and Arb Fabricated Systems, Inc. (collectively "Arb"), major subcontractors involved in a project to build a solar electricity generating station, brought this breach of contract, fraud, and civil RICO action against Luz Construction, Inc. ("Luz"), the general contractor, and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. ("MHT"), the bank which held in escrow the construction funds in dispute. The district court granted summary judgment for MHT, and Arb appeals. 1 We affirm. FACTS 4 Luz…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.