Callahan v. Patsy

972 F.2d 1337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sherry B. CALLAHAN; Jonathan E. Hughes, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard L. PATSY, Judge; Michel & Manning; J. Martin Sproul; Ellen S. James; Katy Gronowski, Esq.; David Wignall, Esq.; County of Contra Costa; C.S. Whitson, Dr.; Jean Barnhardt, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15836. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1992. * Decided Aug. 14, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sherry Callahan and Jonathan Hughes appeal pro se the district court's dismissal of their complaint with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review dismissals pursuant to Rule 41(b) for an abuse of discretion. Hernandez v. Whiting, 881 F.2d 768, 770 (9th Cir.1989). We affirm. 3 In reviewing the district court's dismissal, we must keep in mind Callahan's and Hughes's pro se status. Pro se pleadings…