Berger v. City of Morgan Hill

Good Law
972 F.2d 1337·1992 WL 174562·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29877
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 199291-15927California1,021 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard W. BERGER; Jo Ann Berger, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MORGAN HILL; Fred Mortensen; Jan Perkins; Curtis Wright; Laurie Bark; John Sorsi; Linda English; Ray Bunt; Virginia Mae Days; Thomas Castle; Wengert, Councilman; Bertelli, Councilman; Biechman, Councilman; Morgan Hill Waste Water Facility Financing Corporation; Redevelopment Agency of the City of Morgan Hill; Vavlina, Councilman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15927. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 16, 1992. Decided July 27, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 The Bergers appeal from the district court's dismissal of their action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968 , against Bark, Bunt, Sorsi, and the City of Morgan Hill (collectively City). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.