James Cello-Whitney, Jr., Peter M. Rosenblad v. Chase Riveland

972 F.2d 1337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James CELLO-WHITNEY, Jr., Peter M. Rosenblad, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Chase RIVELAND, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35773. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 27, 1992. * Decided July 31, 1992. Before WRIGHT, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James Cello-Whitney and Peter Rosenblad appeal the district court's bar order, entered on May 2, 1991, refusing to file the pleadings in this civil rights action. We affirm. 3 The district court entered the bar order pursuant to an earlier order dated October 27, 1988, in which the district court set out "a special procedure whereby any future requests by [Cello-Whitney] to proceed in forma pauperis in the Western District of Washington at Seattle or Tacoma will be denied, except upon a showing of good cause to the Court's satisfaction as to why [he] should be permitted to sue on a particular cause of action at public expense."…