Victor Becerril v. Clayton Kidd Eunice v. Martin William B. Sutton, Victor Becerril v. Clayton Kidd Officer Vaughn Officer Vizmanos

Good Law
972 F.2d 1337·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29903
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 199291-15095California2,123 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victor BECERRIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clayton KIDD; Eunice V. Martin; William B. Sutton, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Victor BECERRIL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clayton KIDD; Officer Vaughn; Officer Vizmanos, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 90-16370, 91-15095. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1991. * Decided Aug. 27, 1992. 1 Before TANG and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Victor Becerril, an inmate at the Arizona Department of Corrections ("ADOC"), filed an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) against various state and local employees and police officers in Arizona. The district court granted the defendants' motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. Becerril appeals the district court order. Several of the defendants appeal the district court's ruling that Becerril's notice of appeal was timely filed. 4 * Becerril was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.