Robert L. Bray, Jr. v. Dep't of Corrections Attorney General of California Gardena Parole Dep't

972 F.2d 1337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert L. BRAY, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEP'T OF CORRECTIONS; Attorney General of California; Gardena Parole Dep't, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-55527. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 17, 1992. * Decided Aug. 26, 1992. Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert L. Bray appeals pro se the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus. He makes numerous claims, none of which has merit. We have jurisdiction, and we affirm. 3 Bray's central claim is that the state sentencing court violated Cal.Penal Code § 1170(c) (West 1985) by failing to advise him at sentencing that he would be subject to three years of parole, with the possibility of revocation, after serving his sixteen month sentence. Bray concedes he properly was advised during the hearing on his guilty plea. 4 The alleged violation of section 1170 does not…