Stephen A. Falk v. Lloyd Hayes

972 F.2d 1338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stephen A. FALK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lloyd HAYES, et al. Respondent-Appellee, No. 90-16126. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1992. * Decided Aug. 7, 1992. Before FLETCHER, POOLE and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stephen Falk contends that the district court erred in denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was based on the contention that the Parole Commission improperly reviewed and augmented his sentence. We review the district court's findings of fact under the clearly erroneous standard and its denial of the writ of habeas corpus de novo. Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989). FACTS 3 In April 1987, Stephen Falk began serving his ten-year sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana at the Federal Correctional Institution in Ashland, Kentucky. On September 10, 1987, the Southeastern Regional Office of the…