Eddie Lee Fain v. Robert G. Borg

Good Law
972 F.2d 1338·1992 WL 197605·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 27410
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 199291-16578California683 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eddie Lee FAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16578. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1992. * Decided Aug. 17, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eddie Lee Fain, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motions for an emergency order requiring prison officials to transfer him to the U.C. Davis Medical Center for further treatment of rectal bleeding and chest pain. We construe the denial of these motions as a denial of a preliminary injunction. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1) and affirm. 3 Our review of a preliminary injunction is limited. See Hunt v. National Broadcasting Co., 872 F.2d 289, 292 (9th Cir.1989). We will reverse the district court's denial of a preliminary injunction only if the district court abuses its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.