Cigna Property and Cas. Ins. Co. v. U.S. Dept. of Army

972 F.2d 1338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. CIGNA PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, formerly Aetna Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES of America, DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY; John R. Selby, Inc.; Enfield Construction Company; Clayton's Electric Company, Inc.; Commercial Union Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56064. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 8, 1992. Decided Aug. 5, 1992. Before FLETCHER, O'SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Cigna Property and Casualty Insurance Co. appeals the district court's dismissal of its suit against a construction company for whom Cigna had issued a performance bond, that construction company's subcontractor, the subcontractor's surety and the United States. The district court found Cigna's claim was not ripe for adjudication. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 3 In April, 1984, John R. Selby, Inc. (later Enfield…