Jack E. Fetter v. United States

972 F.2d 1338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack E. FETTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35706. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1992. * Decided Aug. 20, 1992. Before GOODWIN, TANG and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jack E. Fetter appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his case for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Fetter argues that the district court erred in holding that his claims were barred by sovereign immunity. We affirm. 3 Mr. Fetter failed to file federal income tax returns for the taxable years 1981 and 1982. Following the government's notice of tax deficiency and his subsequent nonpayment, a federal tax lien attached to all of Mr. Fetter's real and personal property. Mr. Fetter then sought to enjoin the United States from levying on his wages, to cancel notices of lien and levy sent by the United States, to require the United States to…