Coleman v. Leonardi

972 F.2d 1338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dorman Dean COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul V. LEONARDI, Pima Co. Sheriff's Detective; K. Slawinski, Pima Co. Sheriff's Detective; Robert Mayer, Pima Co. Sheriff's Sergeant; Lois Engstrand, Deputy United States Marshal; Kenneth L. Poppino, Arizona Department of Public Safety Detective, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16674. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1992. * Decided Aug. 17, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dorman Dean Coleman appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendant law enforcement officers in Coleman's action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bur. of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), claiming that the officers relied on false information when they searched the condominium where he was staying and arrested him. Coleman contends that…