Echols v. Yukon Telephone Co., Inc.

972 F.2d 1338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William L. ECHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YUKON TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.; the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.; the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., individually and as members, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35953. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1992. * Decided Aug. 20, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William L. Echols appeals pro se the Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his action against Yukon Telephone Company (Yukon), the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. (NECA), and the NECA Board of Directors (Board). Echols claimed below that he was wrongfully terminated and falsely arrested. On appeal, he contends that the district court erred by finding that (1) he did not state a claim under the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 105 , 106, and 108, the Sherman Antitrust…