Floyd Edwards v. Sean O'keefe, Secretary of the Navy

Good Law
972 F.2d 1338
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 199291-15333California1,162 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Floyd EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sean O'KEEFE, * Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 91-15333, 91-15336. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 16, 1992. Decided Aug. 18, 1992. Before HUG, TANG and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Floyd Edwards, a general foreman of the Port Services Division of the Naval Supply Center, Oakland, appeals the district court's ruling that it lacked jurisdiction to consider his Title VII claims alleging a racially discriminatory performance evaluation and retaliation. The district court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to hear Edwards' complaints because they were moot. We affirm. Discriminatory Evaluation 3 Relying on United States v. W.T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 632 (1953); County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); and Bledsoe v. Webb, 839 F.2d 1357, 1361 (9th Cir.1988); Edwards argues that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.