Leandrew Grayson v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona Hal Carden, Warden

972 F.2d 1339 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leandrew GRAYSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA; Hal Carden, Warden, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-16937. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 27, 1992. * Decided Aug. 4, 1992. Before WRIGHT, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Grayson, an Arizona state prisoner, is serving sentences for three counts of aggravated assault and one count of misconduct involving a weapon. The state of Arizona moved to dismiss his habeas corpus petition. Grayson appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment and dismissal of his petition. 3 Grayson's petition alleged that: (1) he should be eligible for parole; (2) his sentence was improperly enhanced; (3) state officials mishandled his application for a pardon; and (4) prison officials failed to provide proper care for his medical problems. 4 Grayson may have habeas relief if his…