Douglas Gary Housley v. George E. Killinger, Warden

972 F.2d 1339 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Douglas Gary HOUSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George E. KILLINGER, Warden, et al Respondent-Appellee. No. 90-35898. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 10, 1992. * Decided July 22, 1992. Before TANG, FERGUSON and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Douglas G. Housley, a federal prisoner, filed suit against the prison warden, George Killinger. The complaint alleges that Killinger deprived Housley of his constitutional right of access to the courts by failing to provide adequate legal resources in the prison law library. The district court granted Killinger's motions to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and for qualified immunity. The district court also granted Killinger's motion for summary judgment on the merits of Housley's constitutional claims. Housley appeals. We affirm. DISCUSSION I. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies 3 Housley argues that…