John Michael Irk v. Morgan D. Harris

972 F.2d 1339 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Michael IRK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Morgan D. HARRIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15757. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1992. * Decided Aug. 14, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Michael Irk appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court dismissed Irk's action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 Irk contends that he was deprived of due process and equal protection because the public defenders who represented him prior to trial and on appeal provided ineffective assistance and conspired with the prosecutor and judge to secure his conviction. 1 These…