George A. MacKenzie v. Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of the State of Washington Sharon Stewart Johnson

Good Law
972 F.2d 1340
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 199391-35364California214 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. George A. MACKENZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.; Sharon Stewart Johnson, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 90-35648, 91-35364, 91-35580. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 27, 1992. Decided Aug. 3, 1992. As Amended Feb. 19, 1993. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The district court, like every other court or administrator reviewing Mackenzie's allegations, has afforded him an extensive opportunity to present his evidence and arguments. It carefully acknowledged each point in his response to its order to show cause. We agree that summary judgment is appropriate. Appellees' motion to supplement the record is denied as moot. The order granting summary judgment to defendants is AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.