William C. Jarvis v. Jozsef Gyore

972 F.2d 1340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William C. JARVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jozsef GYORE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-55492. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 10, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Jozsef Gyore appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. Gyore contends that the district court's January 25, 1991 judgment against him should be vacated because of (1) newly discovered evidence, (2) evidence of fraud in the district court proceedings, (3) the fact that he was never served with a first amended complaint, and (4) various other procedural irregularities. We review the district court's denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion. Redfield v. Insurance Co. of N. America, 940 F.2d 542, 544 (9th Cir.1991). We affirm. 3 Under Rule 60(b), the district court may relieve a party from a…