Mohammad Reza Mehrmanesh v. United States

972 F.2d 1340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mohammad Reza MEHRMANESH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-15878. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 13, 1992. * Decided July 22, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, POOLE, Circuit Judge, and MARSH, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellant Mohammad Reza Mehrmanesh appeals, pro se, the denial of his motion for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance and that he should not have received separate punishments on the two counts for delivery of a heroin sample and the later delivery of a larger quantity of heroin. 4 These arguments have previously been raised by Mehrmanesh in a direct appeal of his conviction and sentence. United States v. Mehrmanesh, 682 F.2d 1303 (9th Cir.1982). We found that…