Lawrence S. Krain, M.D. v. State Bar of California, Michael Capizzi Corinne S. Shulman, Keith Monroe Daniel Lundgren, Attorney General Howard Winkler

972 F.2d 1340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence S. KRAIN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Michael Capizzi; Corinne S. Shulman, Keith Monroe; Daniel Lundgren, Attorney General; Howard Winkler, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16138. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1992. * Decided Aug. 14, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence S. Krain, M.D., appeals pro se the district court's dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of his civil rights action against the State Bar of California, Orange County, various state prosecutors, and his public defenders in his prior criminal proceedings. Krain also appeals the district court's imposition of a prefiling order. We review the dismissal de novo, Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1447 (9th Cir.1987), and the imposition of a prefiling order for an abuse of discretion, O'Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 617…