John D. O'sullivan, II v. Samuel Lewis

972 F.2d 1341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John D. O'SULLIVAN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15227. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 27, 1992. * Decided July 31, 1992. Before WRIGHT, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Dennies O'Sullivan, II, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In his complaint, O'Sullivan alleged that the "totality of conditions of the [Arizona State Prison Complex at Tucson, Arizona] is completely unconstitutional." The court concluded that the complaint did not adequately identify the unconstitutional conditions at the prison and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. We affirm. 3 In Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1246 (9th Cir.1982), we reiterated that a penal institution must provide "adequate food, clothing, shelter, sanitation, medical care, and personal safety." We also noted the need for…