John Karl Reiman v. H.F. Garcia, Aka: Hippo, and Told S. Stolp

Good Law
972 F.2d 1341·1992 WL 189672·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28022
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 199291-55345California1,480 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Karl REIMAN, et al., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.F. GARCIA, aka: Hippo, et al., Defendant-Appellee. and Told S. STOLP, Defendant, No. 91-55345. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 10, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Karl Reiman appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action for damages for alleged violations of his constitutional rights, anti-trust laws and the RICO statute by various government officials and private individuals ("defendants"). 1 In this action, Reiman also sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to restrain defendants from attacking Iraq. 2 The district court denied the request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction and dismissed the action upon finding that Reiman lacked standing to bring the action and the court lacked jurisdiction. 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.