Charles Adam Rhinehart, AKA Charles Richard Withers v. Pima County Jail Library

972 F.2d 1341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles Adam RHINEHART, aka Charles Richard Withers, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PIMA COUNTY JAIL LIBRARY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16889. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 24, 1992. * Decided Aug. 28, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Adam Rhinehart, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging the loss of a newspaper article he gave prison officials to photocopy. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 Rhinehart first contends he is entitled to damages because prison officials lost his newspaper article. Rhinehart does not state a claim under section 1983 regarding the loss of his property, however,…